ReadySteadyBlog

Readers Comments

  1. I agree with this assessment: it’s enguoh for them to uncritically cite a evangelical celebrity who happens to take their view. It's funny because believers are so quick (and able) to refute the arguments of a brilliant scientist, such as Dawkins, but they drop their guard and don't even bother to think critically about a Christian point of view. This is a bit hypocritical. I'm not even sure that's the right word but the same critical standard should be held for everything.For instance, my favorite apologist, William Lane Craig, doesn't hold to the annihilationist or conditionalist view. But that doesn't mean I should adopt his views on every topic wholesale. We're not members of a political party here where we feel compelled to agree on every point. We can assess the merits of each topic on its own.

Leave a Comment

If you have not posted a comment on RSB before, it will need to be approved by the Managing Editor. Once you have an approved comment, you are safe to post further comments. We have also introduced a captcha code to prevent spam.

 

 

 

Enter the code shown here:   [captcha]

Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above image, reload the page to generate a new one.